Thread: Cricket bats v Baseball bats ep. 290

Baseball bats have been the home defense weapon of choice in England for many years now. Some SWARM members may remember my avatar in the previous forum were I was showing off my beloved "Big Stick" nigger baseball bat. Basically, they are chosen over cricket bats because they are more aerodynamic hence much faster to swing, don't threaten someone with a bat, let them work out what happened when they wake up. Another thing is, cricket bats have short little handles and a large flat surface area. If someone grabs the bat on each side its basically a tug of war. With a baseball bat you just twist it free. Oh, I stick with wood over aluminium, the vibrations if you hit something solid are nasty. Happy battering.

Gay ass English defending their property and lives with kids toys. How pathetic.

But with a baseball bat wouldnt you get more of a whack than a chop? Id think with a hard enough swing of a cricket bat and a good blow to the neck youd be able to take someones head off... baseball bat would probably just bust a windpipe and bruise.

I can see the appeal of not killing someone over manslaughter though.

Didnt Casey Jones use a cricket bat? Or was he more of a hockey stick guy?

Is that true? A man would rather teach his enemy a lesson than destroy him?
I can see how that would be effective.

I like it.

Originally Posted by IronMan666

Gay ass English defending their property and lives with kids toys. How pathetic.

You mindless imbecile! Have you ever handled a real baseball bat? The difficulty with them is in not killing someone, just breaking bones and knocking them out.

Originally Posted by callmesam

I think that what makes a baseball bat more popular "home defense weapon of choice" than cricket bat is the fact that baseball bat is much more masculine object. Its like a giant phallus and when you brandish your gigantic bat-cock in front of an enemy you get an enormous burst of testosterine and feel like medieval Ron Jeremy. Cricket bat with its feminine curves does not have the same effect. Baseball bat is like Conan the Barbarian covered in blood, and cricket bat is like Jack Sparrow with his eyeliner.

Maybe the cricket bat is better if you want to cut the enemys head nicely off, but REAL MEN want to bruise and maim with lots and lots of blood and teeth flying around WOOOOAAAAGGHHHH...

Whoa there! Calm yourself down, you sound like you were shoving one in your ass while you wrote that.

Originally Posted by BKBastard Kestrel

You mindless imbecile! Have you ever handled a real baseball bat? The difficulty with them is in not killing someone, just breaking bones and knocking them out.

It's pointless mate, you've lived your entire life among mediocrity that you cannot understand how gay you are claiming you can choose between 2 toys to defend your property and life.

In America:




While in the Sharia land:




I made my case.

Originally Posted by BKBastard Kestrel

Whoa there! Calm yourself down, you sound like you were shoving one in your ass while you wrote that.

Baseball bat with lubricant on it is better to stick in your arse than a cricket bat which is not so comfortably shaped. Not that I have tried or anything... i mean... errr.... FUCK YOU MAN!